{"id":793,"date":"2007-08-28T01:16:38","date_gmt":"2007-08-28T05:16:38","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.chinacenter.net\/?p=793"},"modified":"2023-04-07T13:40:57","modified_gmt":"2023-04-07T17:40:57","slug":"the-road-ahead-a-preliminary-assessment-of-the-17th-congress-of-the-chinese-communist-party","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.chinacenter.net\/2007\/china-currents\/6-3\/the-road-ahead-a-preliminary-assessment-of-the-17th-congress-of-the-chinese-communist-party\/","title":{"rendered":"The Road Ahead: A Preliminary Assessment of the 17th Congress of the Chinese Communist Party"},"content":{"rendered":"

\"TheEnough time has passed since the 17th Party Congress of the Chinese Communist Party was held in March, 2007, to begin the assessment of a political event that the Chinese president referred to as being characterized by Party unity, policy victory and theoretical achievement of the Sinification of Marxism.<\/p>\n

Three of the many benchmarks are crucial to understanding the effects of the 17th Party Congress. First, will the CCP be able to break away from the past practice of using the Congress to lionize the incumbent or soon-to-retire top leader as a genius whose ideas will be designated as the beacon of the Party\u2019s orientation? Second, will there be a smoother and more institutionalized power transfer? Will Hu Jintao attempt to handpick his successor, much like he was selected by Deng Xiaoping, or will the Party\u2019s institutions play the role of king maker? Third, and perhaps most crucial, will long-awaited political reform be planned and launched in the next five years? We will examine these questions in order.<\/p>\n

On the issue of Congress lionizing out-going leaders, the signs are not positive. President Hu Jintao is being lauded in official discourse for championing a “harmonious” society. In this, Hu is merely following a long Communist tradition of thinking that only a small group of leaders are best informed, wisest, and most qualified to represent all the people and make the best possible decisions for them. Karl Marx had figured out all solutions to the problems of his day. V.I. Lenin founded the first Communist nation by “scientifically” modifying Marxism. Mao Zedong adapted Marxism and Leninism and turned China into the people\u2019s nation. Deng Xiaoping salvaged China from the brink of an economic and social collapse. Jiang Zemin made China prosperous. Hu\u2019s brilliance and genius is on the lips of all Party leaders. He is given credit for China\u2019s economic, cultural, scientific and social achievements. Why has Hu failed to eliminate the bad practice of self-glorification? Either he desires it or it is forced upon him. If we are a little cynical, we can even say it is Chinese to be ruled by a “divine” leader. But surely making an individual\u2019s ideas synonymous with the Party Charter is feudalistic, vain and out of step with the principle of popular sovereignty. This is a new source of disillusionment with the top leadership of China.<\/p>\n

Signals are mixed on the question of transferring power. Even though before the closing of the meeting there were rumors that Xi Jinping, former governor of Fujian and Party secretary of Zhejiang, would be promoted to the Standing Committee of the Politburo, it was a surprise when it happened. Observers inside and outside China believed that Li Keqiang would emerge as heir apparent. The thought was that Hu would do what Mao and Deng had done before: select a successor long before he exited from center stage. This did not happen, and Xi “helicoptered” to the position that was supposed to be Li\u2019s.<\/p>\n

There are multiple explanations for Xi\u2019s sudden elevation. It could be a result of his experience and qualifications:<\/p>\n