|
|
Chinese on the Chattahoochee: K-12 Chinese Language Programs by Krista A. Forsgren In 2000, a meeting at a prominent Atlanta school about the possibility of starting a Chinese language program concluded with a question about the need to study “Red China.” Additional questions followed, about the likely interest of students – let alone parents – in courses in Chinese. Little could the participants imagine how quickly things would change. In the months immediately following, a number of globally minded schools in Atlanta began the process of teaching Chinese, joining the one Georgia school with a long-running high school Chinese program – North Atlanta High School. Others quickly followed, and by 2008, the aforementioned school had jumped on the bandwagon as well. Seemingly overnight, nationwide demand has made Mandarin Chinese one of the “hottest” languages for K-12 schools to teach. National Demand for Chinese Across the country hundreds of Chinese programs have been started in the past few years. Growth has been particularly noteworthy in California, Minnesota, New Jersey, Ohio, Boston, Chicago, Portland (Oregon), and the Bay Area. The Language of the Future Sounds Like Chinese1 and The Future Doesn’t Speak French2 have become familiar headlines, as Chinese language learning in K-12 schools has taken off. While there are no precise statistics for the number of K-12 students studying Chinese, when the American Council on the Teaching of Foreign Languages conducted a survey in 2000, only about 5,000 students were studying Chinese in primary and secondary schools. By 2006, they estimated that number to have reached 30,000 to 50,000.3 By the end of 2008, that number is likely to be exponentially higher, given the number of schools planning to start programs as soon as they can secure qualified teachers. A number of converging forces are fueling this rapid growth. Fear – By way of comparison, some experts have cited the language trends of the 1960s – i.e., the study of Russian after Sputnik – and the 1980s – i.e., the study of Japanese as Japan’s economy soared – and pointed to Chinese as next in this line. In fact, Chinese is similar, yet also different: Perhaps never before has a single nation combined an economy with China’s massive potential, a huge and increasingly well-educated population, and political and military influence to boot. Competition – Forward-thinking parents are always anxious for their children to secure the very best academic and professional opportunities. In a global economy, with increasing ties to Asia, and China in particular, learning to communicate in Chinese seems like the perfect ticket ahead. “There are unbelievable opportunities to do business in China, so there’s a need for Americans to learn the language, so we’re not left out,” says one proponent of Boston’s first Chinese immersion program.4 Similar sentiments can now be heard nationwide. Interest – One only needs to visit one of the Chinese language classrooms in the inner city of Chicago or Atlanta, to appreciate how enthralled elementary students are with the language and culture. Chinese, with its sharp difference from both spoken and written English, has a strong attraction for many children, and arguably youth and adults as well. In the mid-1990s, when the author was first teaching Chinese to elementary school students in New Haven, Connecticut, this strong sense of fascination was clearly on display – long before the current push for Chinese, a decade later. Give American children a choice between studying a language more closely related to English and studying Chinese, and the latter will win out, hands-down. Educational Reform – U.S. education is troubled in more complex ways than revealed by weak standardized reading and math scores. Schools must globalize the curriculum, if they are to effectively train students for the real world of the future. Integrating Chinese into the curriculum as early as possible offers a clear way to shake things up across the board. “Efforts to improve reading, math and science skills may be on the nation’s educational forefront, but quieter efforts are being made by educators and the government to prepare children for the future by teaching them languages such as Arabic and Chinese.”5 China’s “Soft Power” Revolution – The Chinese government has stated that it “wants 100 million Mandarin students worldwide by 2010 (compared to the current estimate of 40 million)” and is putting real money where its mouth is. Since 2004, Beijing’s National Office for Teaching Chinese (commonly known as Hanban) has been opening Chinese language and cultural centers – Confucius Institutes – at a quickening pace across the globe.6 At the most recently established Institutes, moreover, one finds an increasingly direct focus on K-16 Chinese language and culture education. Hanban has also been involved in developing teacher exchange and training programs, to help fill the void of qualified Chinese language teachers. Since 2006, it has invited and sponsored thousands of school administrators from around the U.S. to visit and “experience” China.7 Further, it has supported the development of significant language assessment measures, including the Chinese Advanced Placement test and a revamped version of the Chinese Proficiency Test.8 Chinese in Georgia The Southeast has lagged somewhat behind other regions, in the development of K-12 Chinese programs. But things are changing quickly and with the proper support, and continued collaboration along the lines we have seen in recent years, the region could quickly catch up. In Georgia, only four high school Chinese programs existed in 2000.9 By 2008, more than twenty K-12 schools10 were teaching Chinese. Another ten to fifteen, meanwhile, plan to offer Chinese in the coming year. The outstanding challenges for Georgia, the region, and the nation, however, remain significant:11
What Next? Although Georgia is on track to develop a good network of K-12 schools teaching Chinese, much remains to be done.
Conclusion As every journey must begin with a single step, in Georgia, the first step toward making Chinese a language of the future has been taken. Educators and communities now need to work in collaboration, to create programs that are strong from the outset and viable for the long term.
1. The Language of the Future Sounds Like Chinese, Hartford Courant, Aug. 27, 2007. 2. The Future Doesn’t Speak French, Newsweek, May 9, 2005. A recent article, in USA Today, opens with an even stronger quote: “Chinese isn’t the new French – it’s the new English.” Elizabeth Weise, As China Booms, So Does Mandarin in U.S. Schools, USA Today, Nov. 19, 2007. 3. See Ben Arnoldy, Chinese-Language Classes Full, But Teachers Scarce in U.S., Christian Science Monitor, March 27, 2007. Comparing the number of students studying a given language, rather than patterns of growth, this remains a miniscule number, compared to Spanish or French. In the 2000 ACTFL language survey, over 5 million K-12 students were studying Spanish, or approximately 80% of the total number of students studying a foreign language in U.S. schools. French was a fairly distant second, with about 1.3 million students. See Jamie Draper and June Hicks, Foreign Language Enrollments in Public Secondary Schools, Fall 2000, ACTFL, May 2002, available at www.actfl.org/files/public/enroll2000.pdf. 4. Adam Gorlick, As China’s Power Grows, So Do Chinese Programs in Public Schools, Boston Globe, March 11, 2007, available at www.boston.com/new/local/massachusetts/articles/2007/03/11/. 5. Center Speaks Up for Arabic, Chinese Languages Called Critical to U.S., But Few are Learning or Teaching, Washington Times, March 13, 2007. 6. Jennifer Chen, Mandarin Missionaries, The Wall Street Journal, Sept. 14, 2007, available at http://online.wsj.com. 7. State Superintendent of Schools, Kathy Cox, Deputy Superintendent of Schools, and three members of her staff were participants in the China Bridge Summer 2007 program, and in September 2007 Superintendent Cox convened a meeting of other former Bridge participants to create a list of recommendation about supporting the expansion of Chinese in Georgia. 8. The Chinese Proficiency Test, developed by the HSK Center of Beijing Language and Culture University and commonly known as HSK, is China’s national standardized test of the Chinese proficiency of non-native Chinese speakers. The test developers have been working to create a more proficiency-based exam for the past several years, and made some initial changes in testing format, in Spring 2007. 9. Of particular note is the Chinese program at North Atlanta High School (the only one of the four still in operation, given limited support and systematic planning for Chinese at the other institutions). North Atlanta introduced Chinese – as well as Arabic – in the early 1980s, as part of its International Studies Magnet program. 10. By the fall of 2007, based on annual meetings of the Georgia Chinese Language Educator’s Group and the author’s regular correspondence with foreign language coordinators from across the state, there were twenty-four Georgia schools teaching Chinese language and culture in some form. The actual number is likely even higher, however, given that some schools may not yet be plugged into the state network. 11. See Maura Hallam Sweley, Chinese Fever: Interest in Learning This Less Commonly Taught Language is Hot, The Language Educator (ACTFL), Nov. 2006. 12. As of 2003, Georgia was in somewhat better shape, comparatively, as the number of high school students with at least two years of foreign language instruction was 70%. See Georgia May Drop Foreign Language Requirement in One-Track Diploma System, Minnesota Issue Watch, Jan. 2003, available at http://www.mnplan.state.mn.us/issues/resource.html?Id=3234. 13. See http://www.flageorgia.org/advocacy/ESFLfactSheet.html and http://www.cal.org/resources/archive/rgos/fles.html. 14. Worthy of mention are a number of initiatives that have come from the State Superintendent of Education’s office since her return from China in July 2007. Kathy Cox and her staff have convened meetings on the issue of how to help support the expansion of Chinese language in Georgia’s schools, been meeting with universities in the Atlanta region to discuss teaching training initiatives, and the state also funded a planning grant in 2006-07 for the first Chinese language elementary school program in the state at Toomer Elementary School. 15. See Department of Education Releases Mandarin Chinese Report to the Legislature, Minnesota Department of Education Press Release, Feb. 5, 2007, available at http://cfl.state.mn.us/mde/About_MDE/News_Center/Press_Releases/030712, for one of the most thorough reviews of K-12 Chinese language education programs available. See http://confuciusinstitutechicago.org, for information about Chicago’s Chinese Connections program, currently the largest K-12 Chinese language program in the country, with more than 8,000 students enrolled in Chinese classes in the Chicago public schools. 16. Georgia, and Atlanta in particular, is lucky to have a relatively large population of Mandarin-speaking Chinese and Chinese-Americans, and therefore a number of established heritage school programs; many cities simply do not have the luxury of such a pool of native or non-native speakers of Mandarin Chinese. 17. It should be noted that a pair of charter elementary schools offering Chinese have also recently opened their doors in Atlanta – Imagine Wesley International Charter School and the New Life Academy. 18. E-mail to author from Amy Hayes, Coordinator of School Improvement, Whitfield County Schools, Sept. 27, 2007. Krista Forsgren now works through her own non-profit organization - Windows on Asia (www.windowsonasia.org). She has worked with approximately fifteen schools in Georgia, and many more nationwide, to plan for, implement, and foster Chinese language and culture programs. | ||||||||